Archive for techupdates

Google Apps Premium Edition - Ten (10) questions an enterprise should ask according to Microsoft

It didn’t take long for Microsoft to stand still and say nothing against the Google-CapGemini deal. According to an unnamed Microsoft corporate spokesperson, enterprise should ask the following question when considering use Google Apps Premium Edition for their desktop needs. Here are the lists of questions originally published by Mary Joy Foley

1. Google touts having enterprise level customers but how many “USERS” of their applications truly exist within the enterprise?

2. Google has a history of releasing incomplete products, calling them beta software, and issuing updates on a “known only to Google” schedule – this flies in the face of what enterprises want and need in their technology partners – what is Google doing that indicates they are in lock step with customer needs?

3. Google touts the low cost of their apps –not only price but the absence of need for hardware, storage or maintenance for Google Apps. BUT if GAPE is indeed a complement to MSFT Office, the costs actually become greater for a company as they now have two IT systems to run and manage and maintain. Doesn’t this result in increased complexity and increased costs?

4. Google’s primary focus is on ad funded search. Their enterprise focus and now apps exist on the very fringe and in combination with other fringe services only account for 1% of the company’s revenue. What happens if Google executes poorly? Do they shut down given it will them in a minimal and short term way? Should customers trust that this won’t happen?

5. Google’s apps only work if an enterprise has no power users, employees are always online, enterprises haven’t built custom Office apps – doesn’t this equal a very small % of global information workers today? –On a feature comparison basis, it’s not surprising that Microsoft has a huge lead.

6. Google apps don’t have essential document creation features like support for headers, footers, tables of content, footnotes, etc. Additionally, while customers can collaborate on basic docs without the above noted features, to collaborate on detailed docs, a company must implement a two part process – work together on the basic doc, save it to Word or Excel and then send via email for final edits. Yes they have a $50 price tag, but with the inefficiencies created by just this one cycle, how much do GAPE really cost – and can you afford the fidelity loss?

7. Enterprise companies have to constantly think about government regulations and standards – while Google can store a lot of data for enterprises on Google servers, there is no easy to use, automated way for enterprises to regularly delete data, issue a legal hold for specific docs or bring copies into the corp. What happens if a company needs to respond to government regulations bodies? Google touts 99.9% uptime for their apps but what few people realize that promise is for Gmail only. Equally alarming is the definition Google has for “downtime” – ten consecutive minutes of downtime. What happens if throughout the day Google is down 7 minutes each hour? What does 7 minutes each hour for a full work day that cost an enterprise?

8. In the world of business, it is always on and always connected. As such, having access to technical support 24/7 is essential. If a company deploys Google Apps and there is a technical issue at 8pm PST, Sorry. Google’s tech support is open M-F 1AM-6PM PST – are these the new hours of global business? And if a customer’s “designated administrator” is not available (a requirement) does business just stop?

9. Google says that enterprise customers use only 10% of the features in today’s productivity applications which implies that EVERYONE needs the SAME 10% of the feature when in fact it is very clear that in each company there are specific roles people play that demands access to specific information – how does Google’s generic strategy address role specific needs?”

10. With Google apps in perpetual beta and Google controlling when and if they rollout specific features and functionality, customers have minimal if any control over the timing of product rollouts and features – how do 1) I know how to strategically plan and train and 2) get the features and functionality I have specifically requested? How much money does not knowing cost?

Comments

“It’s time for PHP 5!” says GoPHP5 initiative

Support GoPHP5.orgBecause slow adoption rate of PHP 5 especially among web hosting companies and developers, a number of open source projects and teams have put up an initiative called GoPHP5 to finally mark a due date to stop support PHP4 effective February 5th 2008. After the said date, any new releases of well known open source software will require at least PHP 5.2.0. Major web hosting companies have also agreed to include PHP 5.2.0 as part of their service offering. This is really a bold move and certainly will benefit developers and end-users. PHP4 has done a great job for quite a long time already. It is time to exploit the advanced capability of PHP5, besides PHP6 is just around the corner..

Comments

Tech Updates for June 2007 - Panama, Microsoft and Xandros, RealPlayer, Digg Product & Service Reviews and more

It’s been a week of hibernation, again. It’s time to make a round up “what’s up” on the web!

Yahoo announces their Panama Search Marketing Commercial API Program. The program will give developers, advertisers and technology providers the ability to create new products and tools on top of the Yahoo’s core search marketing platform. Yahoo hope to become the industry leader in SEM and publishing with it’s Panama platform.

Microsoft got a new deal with a Linux company in the name of Xandros. Microsoft understands that today’s business computing environment are a mixture of Linux and Windows systems and they want to make the most out of this practices by building businesses that includes collaboration with Linux/OSS companies. The deal is for five years of 1) System management interoperability; 2) Server interoperability; 3) Office document compatibility; 4) Intellectual property assurance; 5) Microsoft sales and marketing support.

Real Networks announced their updated RealPlayer during the D Conference. They are currently on closed-beta program. The player will be available before June 2007. The new player includes a “one-click video ripping” capability according as described at TechCrunch. I hope the new player will be as lightweight as possible.. I don’t want another RealPlayer a.k.a. “spammy software”

Digg will now allow users to digg services, products and images. Digg wants to expand to cover product and service reviews which are two sought after content by potential customers. With this new move, we will see more SPAM from aggressive marketing outfit to push their product or services to the front page. I guess this will add another headache for the Digg team. Nonetheless, I am excited to see this actually implemented on the site soon!

Comments

Microsoft oPhone - Oh! so seriously funny

I can’t stand watching this spoof video about a fictitious Microsoft oPhone without laughing. “They’ve done it! They’ve really done it! They’ve reinvented the wheel!”. Talke about “circular display”. What a terribe design for a phone. Thankfully it’s a joke!

Comments

Yahoo! Messenger saves your message history online

At the office, we use Yahoo Messenger for communicating with co-workers at our remote office in the US. After successfully logging in to my Y! M, a notification window pop-up with an announcement regarding their “latest exciting feature” called Message History. This feature is related to their earlier announcement of their Web-based IM (flash) application.


So what does this mean for all YM users like me?

The good side - your chat history is available anywhere. After having been into “Laptop” Recovery mode all weekend - and lost all of my YM chat history because of my stupidity - it would have been very good if this Y! Messenger feature was lunched earlier on.

The bad side - your chat history is now owned by Yahoo. Privacy issues anyone?

Expectations, Expectations..

  1. Yahoo! Messenger for desktop should fetch or store chat history on Yahoo! Server or Desktop depending on the user preference
  2. History-off - allow a user to explicitly turn the Message History off on both party (e.g. I can turn off message archiving for a certain user so that the person I’m talking to cannot save the current conversation).

Other instant messaging platform that offers online message archiving/history (that I use are) are Gmail/Google Talk and Meebo.

Comments (2)

Microsoft Hates Google, Wants Yahoo So Bad

After Google bought Doubleclick no so long ago, Microsoft wants to hit hard with Google by intensifying its pursuit of Yahoo. Microsoft wants to take over Yahoo whose price tag is roughly $50 million according to Wall Street sources.

Microsoft wants to get into the game of Internet advertising as quickly as possible because of the fact that Google takes a big lead even before the Doubleclick acquisition. No official comment from Yahoo and Microsoft yet but “if there’s smoke there is fire”. Yahoo’s stock performance is at it’s best today an evidence that investors are taking the news seriously.

For a complete detail of this story, to the following sites

Comments